The issue I addressed in my previous post regarding the ethical implications
of how to resist corporate capitalism’s continuous
encroaching on family life was further illustrated for me the other weekend when I attended the annual People for Education conference at York
University.
Although Executive Director and Founder, Annie Kidder truly summed up this amazing conference here , I remain perplexed in my questions about how "mothers" are often the hidden gendered labor behind the scenes of a school's (and its students) perceived success or failure.
Just as was detailed in this groundbreaking book, mothers' work in and on behalf of their childrens' schools has highlighted inequities of educational opportunities for all children and been increasingly intensified as resources are withdrawn from public schools and our governments shift much of the work of teaching and learning to families. I would also add fundraising to this list as an assumed duty for all mothers of school-aged children to perform.
In a panel session entitled “Public Schools and Private Money: The Fundraising
Dilemma”, discussions highlighted the “desperate times call for
drastic measures” notion whereby short on money for everything
from math workbooks to pencils, public schools are seeking corporate sponsors,
promising them marketing opportunities and access to students in exchange for desperately
needed donations. Of course, we all know that many public schools are
struggling financially and with the threat of closure due to decreased
enrollment. We also are aware that several schools are seeking alternative solutions
which include big money corporate sponsers entering the schools, using our
children as salespeople, and essentially moving from bake sales to big business.
However, one cannot overlook the “bigger picture” and
"make the connections" – as was emphasized at the entire People for
Education conference.
Why are parents and school councils having to resort to
such fundraising measures to compensate for a lack of support for public
schools by our current government?
What does it mean to contribute via such fundraising
mechanisms to the creation of ‘Have’ and ‘Have-not’ schools?
In her presentation based on a
recent report by Social Planning Toronto, entitled"PUBLIC SYSTEM, PRIVATE MONEY:
Fees, Fundraising and Equity in the Toronto District SchoolBoard" Lesley Johnston,
Research and Policy Analyst, highlighted how socio-economic, ethno-cultural and
neighbourhood divides in the city are being institutionalized in a number of
ways so that the principles of equity and inclusivity in our public education
system are being undermined.
In this session, participants asked each other:
"Should Private Money Fund Public Schools?"
"Should
public-private partnerships be formed to shore up gaps in school budgets?
"
This Mother Outlaw is curious what others think about the equity and ethical concerns on this current issue.
Where are lines being drawn on equity principles and how much longer are parents (albeit mothers) expected to fill in with their time and skills to compensate for our current government's inability to provide adequate funding and support for all public schools?
** * Added note: I have no skills in baking however I DO have many other skills to make changes in how we discuss important issues that effect mothers...
Image Credits:
No comments:
Post a Comment